- #Accepted with minor revisions update#
- #Accepted with minor revisions full#
- #Accepted with minor revisions software#
In such cases, new reviewers may be assigned.Īuthors are only permitted to resubmit their article once. Revised articles will be assigned to the same AE and reviewers unless the original AE and reviewers are unavailable, or the AE feels they need additional feedback to make a decision. Will be required to provide a detailed point-to-point document highlightingĮach reviewers’ concerns and how the authors have addressed each concern.
#Accepted with minor revisions update#
To utilize to update their article accordingly. The authors will receive detailed feedback that they will be able Reject (Updates required before resubmission): The article has potential but requires updates before it is suitable for For more information on final files and publication, However, we do recommend carefully reviewing all of the AEĪnd reviewers’ feedback to incorporate any necessary small edits prior to Peer review decisionsĪccept (minor edits): The article is acceptable for Publication, the reasons will be explained to the author. If the article isĪccepted, authors are able to make minor edits to their articles based on Reject decision after the article has completed peer review. Understanding the Decisionsĭue to the binary nature of IEEE Access, authors will receive an accept or Please keep in mind that the final decision rests with the Associate Editor,Īnd the reviewers only provide recommendations. Minimum requirement of 2 independent reviews) they will evaluate the reviewers’Ĭomments, the article itself, and will then determine if the article should beĪccepted or rejected, as per our binary peer review process (see below). Stage 4 Once the AE receives enough reviewers’ feedback (with a Subject matter is presented in a comprehensive manner, and if the references Reviewers will evaluate if the articleĬontributes to the scientific community, if it is technically sound, if the Inviting qualified and relevant reviewers who are experienced in the area ofĮxpertise of the manuscript. The AE feels the article is appropriate for peer review, they will begin Suitability for peer review based on quality, technical content, and scope. Will provide a second thorough vetting of the article to determine its Process, it will then be assigned to an experienced Associate Editor (AE) who Stage 3 Should the article submission pass the initial prescreening
#Accepted with minor revisions full#
For a full submission checklist, please click Rejected, or returned to draft so the authors can update their articleĪccordingly and resubmit. On the severity of any issues presented, the article will either be immediately IEEE Access, and that the technical substance is to IEEE standards. The article willĪlso be vetted by a Senior Editor to confirm the article fits within scope of The article was not submitted elsewhere at the same time.
Includes being evaluated for grammar, formatting, confirming that none of theĪuthors listed are on the IEEE Prohibited Authors List (PAL), and confirming Stage 2 The article will undergo a thorough prescreening check that Rejected, and may result in further investigation and/or correctiveĪctions. If any issues are detected, the article will be immediately For more information on avoiding plagiarism,
#Accepted with minor revisions software#
Through plagiarism software to check for similarity to other published work, Stage 1 Upon submission, each article will automatically be run IEEE Access has a typicalĪcceptance rate of about 30%, which is comparable to other IEEE journals.ĭetailed below are the stages of peer review after article submission. To ensure only high-quality articles are published. Weeks, however, all article submissions still undergo a thorough peer review process
IEEE Access strives to maintain an expedited peer review process of only 4 to 6 Stages of Peer Review Stages of Peer Review from Submission to Accept/Reject Decision
0 kommentar(er)
